I carry the whole cycle
Booking, prepping, chasing, drafting the memo — the logistics that eat a manager's week.
- 6 feedback meetings booked
- David and Sofia chased
- Memo drafted for review
Ron is the AI talent manager who runs a review cycle from inside your team's chat. He does the chasing, the scheduling, and the paperwork, so managers can focus on growing their people and founders on growing the business.
It's on nobody's job description, so it waits for a free week that never comes.
The honest answer is a shrug, or a framework in a doc nobody opens.
A resignation out of nowhere. The check-in that would have caught it never happened.
The urgent always beats the important — and growth is never urgent. Until someone resigns.
Booking, prepping, chasing, drafting the memo — the logistics that eat a manager's week.
Slack, Teams or WhatsApp. Nothing to install, nothing to learn, no adoption cliff.
I run using the terms your team uses: skills, job titles, career matrix. Don't have a matrix yet? I will help you build one.
One senior on a €60k salary walks out. Here's the bill.
Weeks 1–3Onboarding
Before any review opens, I learn how you actually work: who works with whom, how you're structured, and what your levels mean in your words. 90n sets it up with you, for free — and if the matrix doesn't exist yet, we write it together.
You decide who advises whom and who sits on the committee. I map it and propose; you approve.
Weeks 4–5
Everyone names 3–5 colleagues who should speak to their work, then writes their own account of impact. I run it as a conversation, not a form — and I chase the people who go quiet, so you don't have to.
The reflection stays the employee's own words. I structure it; I never write it for them.
Weeks 6–7
Your advisors sit down with the people named across all their advisees. I book every meeting, merge the overlaps, and bring the transcripts back here afterwards.
The advisor runs the meeting and reads the room. Giving honest feedback is a person's job.
Weeks 8–9
Managers share the feedback they collected, the leadership ask clarifying questions, add their perspective and vote on rating and promotion.
I capture everything and prepare the materials for upcoming feedback discussions.
Weeks 10–12
The calibrated outcome becomes a written growth memo, then a real conversation. Nobody receives a rating as a document drop.
The advisor and the committee review, approve and release it. The release decision is never mine — and the conversation is the whole point.

Every person leaves the cycle with a written growth memo: strengths, growth areas, and a concrete next step. Written reasoning keeps the conversation specific and fair, and gives people something to return to.
The whole cohort is scored in one sitting against shared criteria, so one person's “strong” means the same as another's. It creates shared understanding and promotion decisions people can trust.
The cycle reveals the hidden org chart: who people actually turn to, who carries critical knowledge, and which pairs work well together. Plus the themes that keep surfacing across every conversation.
Skill gaps become decisions. You see which capabilities to develop inside the team over the next six months, and which gaps won't close from inside and are worth hiring for.

“In a service business, people are the product, and talent is a strategic advantage. Make development a continuous journey and build on people's strengths. Use AI to raise the ceiling of what your people can do and make your best people even better.”
Ron is opening to a small founding cohort. Leave your email and LinkedIn, and we'll reach out when there's a place for your team.